![]() One layer gives me coverage on the sheer side of medium. MAC calls the coverage flexible I’d characterize it as more medium. I can easily work up to full coverage with Nude Air when I want to, but I can’t seem to get there with MAC Waterweight. Other than the big difference in price (Diorskin Nude Air is $53 versus $33 for MAC Waterweight), Waterweight also comes in three times as many shades (25 shades versus eight, most of which have peach or pink undertones).ĭiorskin Nude Air does have one significant advantage over MAC Studio Waterweight, however, and that’s flexibility. In many ways, I like it more than Dior Diorskin Nude Air Serum, which I used a ton this summer. I’ve been wearing and testing Studio Waterweight in shade NC42 for a few days, and I’m very happy with it. MAC Studio Waterweight Foundation from the left in NC15, NW22, NC35 and NC50 Oh - and there are also noticeable pores and fine lines up in the mix. My skin just can’t make up its mind! It’s oily on my forehead, dry on my cheeks and acne-prone along my jawline and around the edges of my forehead. Very natural looking.Īs one of those lucky ladies with combination skin, I really appreciate that. It’s more refined than that, and velvety. I’m gonna call it a sheen, but I wouldn’t go so far as to call it dewy, because it isn’t shiny at all. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |